Clinical Evaluation to Determine Dry Weight in Hemodialysis is as Good as Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Pages 33-41

Guilherme Breitsameter, Angélica R. de Freitas, Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo and Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo

Graduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12970/2310-984X.2015.03.02.3

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bioelectrical impedance analysis against clinical evaluation for the adequacy of DW in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Material and Methods: A randomized crossover study with patients randomized into two groups: A – DW determined by clinical evaluation (CA), and B – DW evaluated by bioimpedance analysis (BIA), for 4 weeks. After this period, the crossover to the alternate treatment was performed for a further 4 weeks.

Results: The study included 57 CKD patients on HD. No statistical difference was found when comparing the two treatments for data related to blood pressure, hydration parameters and DW, regardless of group.

Conclusions: The results suggest equivalence between the treatments of BIA and CA for determining DW and guiding HD ultrafiltration.

Keywords: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Renal Dialysis, Ideal Body Weight, Weight Gain, Body Water.
Read more