Comparison of Pre and Post-Operative Hearing Results in Patients Undergone Modified Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Perichondrium Myringoplasty 

Authors

  • Bikash Lal Shrestha Department of Otorhinolaryngology And Head And Neck Surgery, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
  • Ram Chayaman Amatya Department of Otorhinolaryngology And Head And Neck Surgery, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
  • Inku Shrestha Department of Otorhinolaryngology And Head And Neck Surgery, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
  • Monika Pokharel Department of Otorhinolaryngology And Head And Neck Surgery, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2308-7978.2013.01.02.5

Keywords:

 Air bone gap, cartilage, chronic otitis media, Myringoplasty.

Abstract

 Objective: The perichondrium cartilage graft has its advantage not only on hearing outcome but also in graft uptake rate. So, the main aims are to compare the pre and post-operative hearing results and to observe the graft uptake rate. Materials and methodology: This is a prospective, longitudinal and analytical study conducted in the department of otorhinolaryngology in Kathmandu university hospital from 1st January 2011 to 1st June 2012. There were 34 patients who underwent modified inlay butterfly cartilage perichondrium myringoplasty using tragal cartilage perichondrium in ≥13 years patients and with the diagnosis of Chronic otitis media (mucosal- inactive) with central perforation of >50% and those requiring revision surgeries for failed myringoplasties were included. The pre and post-operative PTA (pure tone audiogram) was performed and evaluated. The post-operative hearing was assessed in terms of average ABG (air bone gap) and size of ABG closure. Results: Among 34 patients, the 30 (88.2%) patients had graft uptaken. Other 4 patients had residual perforation because of infection. The post operative ABG was smaller than the pre operative ABG. (36.57+/-12.13dB and 26.41+/-8.47dB respectively) The mean ABG closure was 10.15+/-10.23dB. The ABG closure was smaller than 10dB in 15 (50%) patients. Conclusion: There was statistically significant improvement in postoperative ABG with ABG closure within 10dB in 50% of patients. So, it is useful to perform the procedure in subtotal to total perforation with good outcome. 

References


[1] Berthold E. Uber Myringoplastic. Med-chir centralb 1879; 14: 195-207.
[2] Tabb HG. Closure of perforations of the tympanic membrane by vein grafts: a preliminary report of 20cases. Laryngoscope 1960; 70: 271-86.
[3] Goodhill V. Articulated polyethylene prosthesis with perichondrial graft in stapedectomy. Rev Laryngol (Bordeaux) 1951; 82: 305-20
[4] Linde RE. The cartilage-perichondrium graft in the treatment of posterior tympanic membrane retraction pockets. Laryngoscope 1973; 83: 747-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197305000-00010
[5] Storrs L. Myringoplasty with the use of Fascia Grafts. Arch Otolaryngol 1961; 74: 45-49.
[6] Yetiser S, Tosun F, Satar B. Revision myringoplastywith solvent-dehydrated human dura mater: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124(5): 518-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2001.115058
[7] Heermann J, Heermann H, Kopstein E. Fascia and cartilage palisade tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 91: 228-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040334004
[8] Couloigner V, Baculard F, El Bakkouri W, Viala P, Francois M, Narcy P, et al. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 247-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200503000-00020
[9] Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 1994-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200012000-00002
[10] Adkins WY. Composite autograft for tympanoplasty and tympanomastoid surgery. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 244-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199003000-00007
[11] Uslu C, Tek A, Tatlipinar A, Kilicarslan Y, Durmus R, et al. Cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty: ontological and audiological results. Acta Oto-Laryngol 2010; 130: 375-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016480903145346
[12] Yung M. Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review. J LaryngolOtol 2008; 122: 663-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215108001813
[13] Eavey RD. Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 657-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199805000-00006
[14] Rourke T, Snelling JD, Aldren C. Cartilage graft myringoplasty: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 2010; 35: 135- 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02089.x
[15] American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113: 186-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70103-6
[16] Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1997; 107: 1094-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199708000-00016
[17] Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1000-patients series. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1844-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200311000-00002
[18] Dornhoffer JL. Cartilage tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006; 39: 1161-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2006.08.006
[19] Zahnert T, Huttenbrink K, Murbe D, Bornitz M. Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Am J Otol 2000; 21: 322-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0709(00)80039-3
[20] Kerr AG, Byme JET, Smyth GDL. Cartilage homografts in the middle ear: a long term histologic study. J Laryngol Otol 1973; 87: 1193-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100078166
[21] Matthew JG, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 1994-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200012000-00002
[22] Kirazli T, Bilgen C, Midilli R, Ogut F. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132: 933-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.044
[23] Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 985-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0291-3
[24] Ozbek C, Cifci O, Tuna E, Yazkan O, Ozdem C. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type I tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 679-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817dad57
[25] Ghanem MA, Monroy A, Alizadeh FS, et al. Butterfly cartilage graft inlay myringoplasty for large perforations. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 1813-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000231742.11048.ed
[26] Mauri M, Neto JFL, Fuchs SC. Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: A randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 1479-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200108000-00027

Downloads

Published

2013-02-02

Issue

Section

Articles