Evaluation of Speech Production Skills After Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in 45 Prelingual Deaf Patients 

Authors

  • Neha Shah Department of E.N.T., B.J. Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad-380016, Gujarat, India
  • Rajesh Vishwakarma Department of E.N.T., B.J. Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad-380016, Gujarat, India
  • Amit Kumar Department of E.N.T., B.J. Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad-380016, Gujarat, India
  • Rupali Mathur Department of E.N.T., B.J. Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad-380016, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2308-7978.2013.01.02.3

Keywords:

 Unilateral Cochlear Implantation, Prelingual Deaf Patients, Speech Production Skills, MUSS Questionnaire.

Abstract

 Objectives: To determine speech production skills in everyday situations following unilateral Cochlear Implantation. Methods: 45 prelingual deaf patients who underwent unilateral Cochlear Implantation under B.J. Medical College Cochlear and Hearing Implant Programme from April 2007 to August 2010 were included in the study. Participants were divided into five groups on basis of age at which participants underwent implantation: ≤3 years, 3 to 6 years, 6 to 9 years, 9 to 12 years, 12 to 15 years. MUSS Questionnaire was administered before implantation unaided and at three post-implant switch-on time periods 6 months, 1 year and 2 years with Cochlear Implant alone. The study was retrospective and prospective comparative interventional type with quantitative approach. The study was based on individual children evaluated with repeated measures, each child serving as his own control. The significance of the difference between the individual preoperative and postoperative scores was evaluated using the post hoc test of repeated measure analysis. Results: Pre-op average MUSS Questionnaire score was ≤ 4/40 in all implanted age groups with scores increasing over time to attain average score ranging from 27.5 to 34.78/40 in all implanted age groups after two years of implantation. The score increased significantly (p<0.05) in all implanted age groups from pre- to post- CI. Improved ratings were found for those implanted at younger age (≤ 3 years) than those implanted later. Discussion: There is significant improvement in speech production skills after cochlear implantation which continues to improve over time, highlighting the need for continuous auditory-verbal training. This study highlights the importance of age of implantation. Better results seen in those implanted at younger age. 

References


[1] Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Davis AC. Cochlear implantation: demand, costs, and utility. An Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 245-8.
[2] Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, Mellon NK, Francis HW, Niparko JK. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. JAMA 2000; 284(7): 850-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.7.850
[3] NIH Publication No. 11-4798 (2011-03-01). 2010 Cochlear Implants. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/ hearing/pages/coch.aspx.
[4] Miyamoto R, Osberger M, Robbins A, Myres W, Kessler K, Pope M. Comparison of speech perception abilities in deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104: 42-46.
[5] Miyamoto R, Osberger M, Robbins A, Myres W, Kessler K. Prelingually deafened children’s performance with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1993; 4: 437-45.
[6] Shea JrIII DE, Lupfer M. Speech perception after multichannel cochlear implantation in the pediatric patient. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 66-70.
[7] Uziel A, Reuillard-Artieres F, Sillon M, Vieu A, Mondain M, Piron JP, et al. Speech perception performance in prelingually deafened French children using the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 559-68.
[8] Tyler RS, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay DMR, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GP, Parkinson A. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 180-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70172-4
[9] Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications 2003.
[10] Robbins AM, Osberger MJ. Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS). Indianopolis: Indiana University School of Medicine 1990.
[11] Zakirullah, Mukhtar N, Iqbal M, Khan J, Ahsan M, Shah SA. Evaluation of Auditory Perception Skills Development in Profoundly Deaf Children Following Cochlear ImplantationPreliminary report. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008; 20(1): 94-97.
[12] Robinson K. Implications of developmental plasticity for the language acquisition of deaf children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 46: 71-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(98)00125-6

Downloads

Published

2013-02-02

Issue

Section

Articles