Further Study of “Care Partnerships”: The Rheumatology Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12970/2310-9874.2014.02.01.1Keywords:
Rheumatology, arthritis, family physicians, specialists, care partnership, communicationAbstract
Objective: We have previously described rheumatology ‘care partnerships’ from the perspective of Quebec family doctors. Our current objective was to describe the perceptions of rheumatologists regarding rheumatology ‘care partnerships’.
Methods: Practicing Quebec adult rheumatologists (N=100) were mailed a questionnaire, asking them to rate, on a 5-point scale, factors of importance regarding their relationship with family physicians. A factor was considered to be ranked as high importance to the rheumatologist, if the factor was scored as >4.
Results: Of the 100 rheumatologists contacted, 56 completed the survey. All but one of the respondents (n=55) ranked communication and information exchange, as being of high importance. Clear and appropriate balance of responsibilities was also considered very important by most respondents (n=47, 84%) as was appropriateness of referrals from the family physicians (n=42, 75%). Personal knowledge of the family physician (n=19, 34%) and physical proximity to the family physician (n=7, 13%) were less frequently ranked as important to rheumatologists.
Conclusion: Along with our previous work, these results confirm that rheumatologists and family doctors share similar values when it comes to rheumatology “care partnerships”. Further study of how to optimize relationships between family physicians and specialists would be of interest.
References
Furneri G, Mantovani LG, Belisari A, et al. Systematic literature review on economic implications and pharmacoeconomic issues of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012; 30: S72-84.
Power JD BE, DesMeules ME. Arthritis in Canada: an ongoing challenge. Ambulatory care services. Ottawa: Health Canada 2003; pp. 51-64.
Sen D, Brasington R. Tight disease control in early RA. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2012; 38: 327-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2012.04.004
Zhang W, Sun H, Emery P, et al. Does achieving clinical response prevent work stoppage or work absence among employed patients with early rheumatoid arthritis? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51: 270-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker189
Lacaille D, Anis AH, Guh DP, Esdaile JM. Gaps in care for rheumatoid arthritis: a population study. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 241-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21077
Jamal S, Alibhai SM, Badley EM, Bombardier C. Time to treatment for new patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a major metropolitan city. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 1282-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.101315
Lou B, M DEC, Ehrmann Feldman D, Bissonauth A, Bernatsky S. Care partnerships between family physicians and rheumatologists. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 1981-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.101150
Forrest CB, Nutting PA, Starfield B, von Schrader S. Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 215-22.
Berendsen AJ, Benneker WH, Meyboom-de Jong B, Klazinga NS, Schuling J. Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2007; 7: 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-4
Marshall MN. How well do general practitioners and hospital consultants work together? A qualitative study of cooperation and conflict within the medical profession. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1379-82.
Berendsen AJ, Benneker WH, Schuling J, Rijkers-Koorn N, Slaets JP, Meyboom-de Jong B. Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists--a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-155
