Definition of Italian Specific DXA References for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis: Preliminary Data from the Osteoporosis Registry of Magenta Rheumatology School (OSTEOREMA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12970/2310-9874.2016.04.01.1Keywords:
Reference data, Osteopenia, Osteoporosis, prevalenceAbstract
Background: Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease and dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans is the gold standard to evaluate individuals at risk of osteoporosis. Up to date, studies focused on population specific DXA values among general population are lacking. Primary aim of this study was to obtain lumbar and femoral DXA values of Italy adult females based on a nationally representative sample aged 20 years and older, attempting to obtain a national specific normative bone mineral density (BMD) levels curve.
Methods: demographic and anthropometric data of females aged 20 years and older that performed their first DXA (QDR 9000 Hologic, Waltham, Mass.) in our Hospital between 2006 and 2015 were extracted from our local registry using a random sampling technique. Criteria for patient choice were: absence of known risk factors of Osteoporosis (e.g. smoke, alcohol), metabolic disease that affects bone (e.g. diabetes), a normal BMI between 18.5 to 24.5, previous fractures, any medication for treatment of osteoporosis or corticosteroids, spondylosis radiologically relevant. Our database was compared to Caucasian normal values incorporated into Hologic’s scan analysis software, that we proven were comparable in terms of BMI, gender and age.
Results: DXA scan of 15335 women were extracted and analysed. Mean age was 64.2 ± 12.8 years (range 20.8 to 90). Mean BMI was 22.4± 5.1 (range 20.1 to 24.3). Mean menopause age was 41.3±5 (range 31-54). Mean menarche age was 16.3±5 (range 11-17). The lumbar and femoral BMD were substantially constant between 25 and 35 years (test for trend using ANOVA: P =0.31); these data collected in premenopausal women (mean 1.043± 0.12 g/cm2 for lumbar spine and 0.97± 0.136 g/cm2 for femoral neck) were thus defined as the reference peak bone mass values, significantly lower compared to the Hologic reference values (mean 1.079±0.11 g/cm2, p<0.05). The frequency of osteopenia and osteoporosis were so significantly different depending on whether you use the manufacturer criteria rather than those derived from collected data (X square p=0,01).
Conclusions: our data suggest that the reference curves for the lumbar spine and femoral neck are significantly different from the current normative data reported by the manufacturer for the Italian population.
References
Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002; 359(9321): 1929-1936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08761-5
Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002; 359: 1761-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9
Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, et al. A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 527-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001980200069
Johansen A, Evans RJ, Stone MD, Richmond PW, Lo SV, Woodhouse KW. Fracture incidence in England and Wales: a study based on the population of Cardiff. Injury 1997; 28: 655-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00144-7
Dolan P, Torgerson DJ. The cost of treating osteoporotic fractures in the United Kingdom female population. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 611-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001980050107
Clark S. Osteoporosis - the disease of the 21st century? Lancet 2002; 359: 1714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08662-2
Heaney RP, Abrams S, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Peak bone mass. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11(12): 985-1009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001980070020
Nguyen TV, Maynard LM, Towne B, et al. Sex differences in bone mass acquisition during growth: the Fels Longitudinal Study. J Clin Densitom 2001; 4(2): 147-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/JCD:4:2:147
Noon E, Singh S, Cuzick J, et al. Significant differences in UK and US female bone density reference ranges. Osteoporos Int 21(11): 1871-1880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-1153-1
Mikuls TR, Saag KG, Curtis J, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia among African Americans with early rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of ethnic-specific normative data. J Natl Med Assoc 2005; 97(8): 1155-1160.
Hoiberg M, Nielsen TL, Wraae K, et al: Population-based reference values for bone mineral density in young men. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18(11): 1507-1514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0399-8
Kawai M, Devlin MJ, Rosen CJ. Fat targets for skeletal health. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2009; 5: 365-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2009.102
Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Min Res 2002; 17: 2222-30.
Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 1993; 341: 72-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8
Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapuy M-C, Delmas PD. Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 337-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650110307
Mora S, Gilsanz V. Establishment of peak bone mass. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2003; 32: 39-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8529(02)00058-0
Hannan MT, Felson DT, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Risk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 710-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.710
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H.: Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996; 312(7041): 1254-1259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254
Bredella MA, Torriani M, Ghomi RH, et al. Determinants of bone mineral density in obese premenopausal women. Bone 2011; 48: 748-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.12.011
Ho SC, Chan SG, Yip YB, Chan CSY, Woo JLF, Sham A. Change in bone mineral density and its determinants inpre- and perimenopausal Chinese women: the Hong Kong perimenopausal women osteoporosis study. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 1785-1796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0614-2
Park JJ, Shin J, Youn Y, et al. Bone mineral density, body massindex, postmenopausal period and outcomes of low back pain treatment in Korean postmenopausal women. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1942-1947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1559-7
Wilsgaard T, Emaus N, Ahmed LA, et al. Lifestyle impact onlifetime bone loss in women and men. The Tromso Study. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 16: 9877-886.
Coin A, Perissinotto E, Enzi G, et al. Predictors of low bone mineral density in the elderly: the role of dietary intake, nutritional status and sarcopenia. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008; 62: 802-809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602779
De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 1330-1338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1863-y
Moayyeri A, Luben RN, Wareham NJ, Khan K-I. Body fat mass is a predictor of risk of osteoporosis fractures in womenbut not in men: a prospective population study. J Intern Med 2012; 271: 472-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02443.x
Diaz Curiel M, Carrasco de la Pena JL, Honorato Perez J, Perez Cano R, Rapado A, Ruiz Martinez I. Study of bone mineral density in lumbar spine and femoral neck in a Spanish population. Multicentre Research Project on Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1997; (7): 59-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01623462
Lofman O, Larsson L, Ross I, Toss G, Berglund K. Bone mineral density in normal Swedish women. Bone 1997; 20: 167-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00345-6