Facebook Support Groups in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Content Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12970/2310-9874.2015.03.02.4Keywords:
Systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus, support groups, Facebook.Abstract
Background: There are many disease-specific groups on Facebook, which offer a convenient way to exchange information and support. This may be particularly helpful for patients affected with uncommon diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The content of SLE-related Facebook support groups, however, has yet to be explored and evaluated.
Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the content of Facebook support groups related to SLE, specifically evaluating the nature of the information shared and the pattern of use.
Methods: Two independent investigators searched for the term “lupus” on Facebook’s native search function, from 10/08/2011 to 01/04/2012. Groups related to SLE, operating in English and/or French, and publicly accessible, were included for analysis. Information regarding the purpose of the group, its administrator, as well as the number and type of user-generated contributions were extracted. The content of support groups were then analyzed using a previously developed coding scheme.
Results: We found 173 SLE groups on Facebook containing a total of 42,240 members. Roughly half (53%) of the groups were created for support, while 33% were for disease awareness, and 14% for fundraising. The largest group included 30,972 members and was intended for raising awareness. 3,469 members were found in support groups, representing 8% of the overall membership (but 31% of the overall membership when excluding the largest group). The median number of members was 11 (interquartile range, IQR, 39). The most frequent locations of support groups were the United States (44%), Canada (10%), and United Kingdom (10%). In support groups, the total number of user-generated contributions was 1932, including wall posts (54%), comments (32%), discussion posts (10%), and discussion threads (4%), while the median number of user-generated contributions was 5 (IQR 20).
Conclusions: Support groups for SLE patients represent a substantial proportion of Facebook groups dedicated to SLE. Given their convenience, accessibility, and potential audience, Facebook support groups might represent an efficient way to reach patients with SLE who are internet users and improve their health-related quality of life. Further research is needed to evaluate the effects of this type of support groups on patients with SLE.
References
Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, et al. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J General Internal Med 2011; 26: 287-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1526-3
Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, et al. A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e85.
Mazzoni D, Cicognani E. Sharing experiences and social support requests in an internet forum for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Health Psychol 2014; 19: 689-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105313477674
Farmer AD, Bruckner Holt CE, Cook MJ, et al. Social networking sites: A novel portal for communication. Postgraduate Med J 2009; 85: 455-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2008.074674
Facebook, First Quarter 2013 Financial Summary 2013.
Bender JL, Jimenez-Marroquin MC, Jadad AR. Seeking support on Facebook: A content analysis of breast cancer groups. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e16.
Kim C, Kang BS, Choi HJ, et al. Nationwide online social networking for cardiovascular care in Korea using Facebook. J of the Am Med Informatics Association: JAMIA 2014; 21: 17-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001465
Walker KK. A content analysis of cognitive and affective uses of patient support groups for rare and uncommon vascular diseases: Comparisons of May-Thurner, Thoracic Outlet, and Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome. Health Communication 2014; 1-13.
Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Systemic lupus erythematosus. New Engl J Med 2008; 358: 929-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra071297
Danoff-Burg S, Friedberg F. Unmet needs of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Behavioral medicine (Washington, DC) 2009; 35: 5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/BMED.35.1.5-13
Moses N, Wiggers J, Nicholas C. Persistence of unmet need for care among people with systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study. Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 867-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9361-2
Archenholtz B, Burckhardt CS, Segesten K. Quality of life of women with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis: domains of importance and dissatisfaction. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 411-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008915115370
Plevinsky JM, Greenley RN. Exploring health-related quality of life and social functioning in adolescents with inflammatory bowel diseases after attending camp oasis and participating in a Facebook group. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; 20: 1611-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000120
