Ultra Sound Scanning and the Internet of Things: A Theoretical Model

Authors

  • Athanasios Tsatsaris Ierion Corporation, USA
  • Steven Domenikos Ierion Corporation, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1755.2018.06.01

Keywords:

 Internet of things, Ultra-Sound wave, Electromagnetic Wave, High frequency, Nanotechnology.

Abstract

Nowadays, men have achieved extraordinarily high level of scientific achievements in all areas of disciplines. Considering the vast majority of scientific innovations that dictate man’s everyday life, it is easily to deduce the common factor of them: The well Known Internet of Things (IoT). IoT is gaining attention from governments to companies and consumers alike, due to its potential to control and manipulate everything that surrounds the world. Yet, extensive research is needed, so as to obtain optimal, secure use of new applications. In this study, we hypothesize a machine (M) which is plugged and connected to the Internet. The target is to unlock its operational system and retrieve the stored information. Two devices (D1,D2) will be used to decode the M system. D1 will emit high frequency ultrasound signals scanning the M entirely, using a specific common Language of IoT (CLoIoT) which will be developed in this work, while D2 (often D2 = D1) will receive the feedback and decode the transferred information. The CLoIoT is based on the creation of sequential sinusoidal algorithms. The unlocking of M will take place through discovering the operational digital “frequency”, under the continuous Nano-scanning of the device. It is a process termed as a lock-ultrasound-Key effect.

References

Bucley J. The Internet of Things: From RHD to the NextGeneration Pervasive Networked Systems. Auerbach Publications, New York 2006.

Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computers Systems 2013; 29: 1645-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010

Zorzi M, Gluhak A, Lange S, Bassi A. From today’s Intranet of Things to a future Internet of Things: A wireless-and mobility-related view. IEEE Wireless Communications 2010; 17: 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2010.5675777

Akyildiz LF, Melodia T, Chowdhury KR. A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Computer Networks 2007; 51: 921-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.10.002

Yock PG. Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation 2001; 103: 604-616. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.4.604

Staub D, Partovi S, Imfeld S, Uthoff H, Baldi T, Aschwanden M, Jaeger K. Novel Applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in vascular medicine. Vasa 2013; 42(1): 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000244

Kalokairinou-Motogna M, Maratou K, Paianid I, Soldatos T, Antipa E, Tsikkini A, Baltas CS. Application of color Doppler ultrasound in the study of small pleural effusion. Med Ultrason 2010; 12(1): 12-6.

Abelson H, Sussman GJ, Sussman J. Structure and Interpretation of computer programs. MIT Press Cambridge and McGraw-Hill Book Company New York 1996.

Qifa Z, Sienting L, Dawei W, Kirk Shung K. Piezoelectric films for high frequency ultrasonic transducers in biomedical applications. Prog Mater Sci 2011; 56(2): 139-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.09.001

Donady S, Couder Y. Phyllotaxis as a Dynamical Self Organising Process. J Theor Biol 1996; 178: 255-74.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-18

Issue

Section

Articles