Referential Choice in the Narratives of Italian Speakers with Klinefelter Syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2014.02.02.4Keywords:
Klinefelter syndrome, reference choice, linguistic abilities.Abstract
Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) is a genetic disorder characterized by an uneven neuro-linguistic profile. Whereas cognitive abilities appear to be within the normal range, KS patients often show poor linguistic abilities and language-based learning disorders. Although it has been proposed that KS can be considered a genetic model of language impairment, it is not yet well established whether speakers with KS are impaired in specific psycholinguistics aspects, such as reference production. The choice of an adequate referential expression (whether a full noun phrase, a null or overt pronoun, etc.) involves the use of memory mechanisms to represent the characters and actions involved, but also the ability to judge the attention and the knowledge of the hearer.
The present work focuses on KS speakers’ ability to report a story based on a Sylvester and Tweety cartoon (Arnold et al., 2009). We examine the ability to choose an appropriate referent (overt pronouns vs. null pronoun vs. full noun phrase) made during a narrative by Italian adolescents and young adults with KS (n = 8) and age-matched typically developing controls. In addition, we administered to each participant a full battery of cognitive and linguistic tests.
Overall our results indicate that the correct use of referential expressions did not appear to be significantly predicted by the cognitive level of the speakers. Therefore the ability to choose an appropriate referential expression is preserved in KS whereas receptive vocabulary and comprehension skills are significantly lower as compared to controls.
References
Verri AP, Cremante A, Clerici F, Destefani V, Radicioni A. Klinefelter’s syndrome and psychoneurologic function. Mol Hum Repr 2010; 16: 425-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaq018
Gropman A, Samango-Sprouse CA. Neurocognitive variance and neurological underpinnings of the X and Y chromosomal variations. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2013; 163C: 35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31352
Mandoki MW, Sumner GS, Hoffman RP, Riconda DL. A review of Klinefelter’s syndrome in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1991; 30: 167-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199103000-00001
Ratcliffe SG, Jenkins J, Teague P. Cognitive and behavioural development of the 47, XYY child. In: Berch DB, Bender BG (eds). Sex Chromosome abnormalities and behaviour: psychological studies, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990, 161-184.
Boone KB, Anath J, Philpott L, Kaur A, Djenderedjian A. Neuropsychological characteristics of nondepressed adults with obsessive–compulsive disorder. Neuropsychiat Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1991; 4: 96-109.
Geschwind DH, Gregg J, Boone K, et al. Klinefelter’s syndrome as a model of anomalous cerebral laterality: testing gene dosage in the X chromosome pseudoautosomal region using a DNA Microarray. Dev Genet 1998; 23: 215-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)23:3<215::AID-DVG7>3.0.CO;2-X
Bender BG, Linden MG, Robinson A. Neuropsychological impairment in 42 adolescents with sex chromosomes abnormalities. Am J Med Genet 1993; 48: 169-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320480312
Boada R, Janusz J, Hutaff-Lee C, Tartaglia N. The cognitive phenotype in Klinefelter syndrome: a review of the literature including genetic and hormonal factors. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009; 15: 284-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.83
Verri AP, Galimberti CA, Perucca P, Cremante A, Vernice M, Uggetti A. Psychotic disorder and focal epilepsy in a left-handed patient with chromosome XYY abnormality. Gen Couns 2008; 19: 373-9.
Bancroft J, Axworthy D, Ratcliffe S. The personality and psychosexual development of boys with 47, XXY chromosome constitution. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 1982; 23: 169-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1982.tb00061.x
Montalbetti M. After binding. On the interpretation of pronouns [PhD thesis]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT; 1984.
Ariel M. Cognitive universals and linguistic conventions: The case of resumptive pronouns. Studies in Lang 1999; 23: 217-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.23.2.02ari
Tsimpli I, Sorace A. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In: Bamman D, Magnitskaia T, Zaller C (eds). Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 2006; 653-64.
Arnold JE, Bennetto L, Diehl JJ. Reference production in young speakers with and without autism: effects of discourse status and processing constraints. Cogn 2009; 110: 131-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.016
McNeill D. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992.
Jaeger TF. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. J Mem Lang 2008; 59: 434-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Clark HH, Krych MA. Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. J Mem Lang 2004; 50: 62-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.004