Improving Deaf Children’s Working Memory through Training

Authors

  • Terezinha Nunes Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Rossana Barros Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Deborah Evans Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Diana Burman Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2014.02.02.1

Keywords:

 Working memory, deaf children, rehearsal training, attention control.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design and to assess the effectiveness of a working memory (WM) intervention for deaf children. A review of factors that explain deaf students’ poor results in WM tasks was used to identify deaf participants' strengths and difficulties in WM tasks. This review formed the basis for the design of the WM training program assessed in the study.

Participants were 77 children in a comparison group and 73 in an intervention group, with the mean age of 8y5m at the start of the program. The participants' severity of hearing loss was at least moderate; approximately 68% of the children had one cochlear implant and the rest had hearing aids only. The design was quasi-experimental: teachers rather than children were assigned either to the comparison or the intervention group.

The children were pre- and post-tested in three WM tasks; the regression factor score was used as the measure of their WM. The intervention was implemented by the teachers and comprised two types of games: teacher led games, during which the teachers taught the children rehearsal strategies that combined linguistic and visual-spatial encoding, and web-based games, which the children played without a tutor and involved biased competition with the aim of developing attention control.

An analysis of covariance (controlling for pre-test WM scores, age, cognitive ability and pre- to post-test interval) showed that the intervention group differed significantly from the comparison group at post-test; Cohen's d effect size was 0.78. We conclude that it is possible to improve deaf children's performance in WM measures by training that targets their attention problems and teaches them rehearsal strategies.

References

Shipstead Z, Redick TS, Engle RW. Is working memory training effective? Psychol Bull 2012; 138: 628-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027473

Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4: 417-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Baddeley AD, Allen RJ, Hitch GJ. Binding in visual working memory: the role of the episodic buffer. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49: 1393-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.042

Harris M, Moreno C. Deaf Children's Use of Phonological Coding: Evidence from Reading, Spelling, and Working Memory. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2004; 9: 253-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enh016

Burkholder RA, Pisoni DB. Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation. J Exp Child Psychol 2003; 85: 63-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00033-X

Cleary M, Pisoni DB, Geers AE. Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 395-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200110000-00004

Fagan MK, Pisoni DB, Horn DL, Dillon CM. Neuropsychological correlates of vocabulary, reading, and working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2007; 12: 461-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm023

Geers AE. Predictors of reading skill development in children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000051690.43989.5D

Pisoni DB, Geers A. Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: Correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000; 109: 92-3.

Schorr EA, Roth FP, Fox NA. A Comparison of the speech and language skills of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Commun Disord Q 2008; 29: 195-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525740108321217

Daneman M, Nemeth S, Stainton M, Huelsmann K. Working memory as a predictor of reading achievement in orally educated hearing-impaired children. Volta Rev 1995; 97: 225-41.

Garrison W, Long G, Dowaliby F. Working memory capacity and comprehension processes in deaf readers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1997; 2: 78-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014315

Gottardis L, Nunes T, Lunt I. A synthesis of research on deaf and hearing children’s mathematical achievement. Deafness Educ Int 2011; 13: 131-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1557069X11Y.0000000006

Lang H, Pagliaro C. Factors predicting recall of mathematics terms by deaf students: implications for teaching. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2007; 12: 449-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm021

Gathercole SE, Pickering SJ. Assessment of working memory in six- and seven-year-old children. J Educ Psychol 2000; 92: 377-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.377

Gathercole SE, Pickering SJ. Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at seven years of age. Br J Educ Psychol 2000; 70: 177-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709900158047

Pickering S, Gathercole S. Working memory test battery for children (WMTB-C) Manual. London: The Psychological Corporation 2001.

Daneman M, Carpenter PA. Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 1980; 19: 450-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6

Wechsler D. WISC-III UK Manual 1992. Sidcup, Kent: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Elliott CD, Smith P, McCulloch K. British Ability Scale-II Technical Manual. London: nferNelson Publishing Company 1997.

Marschark M, Bebko JM. Memory and information processing: a bridge from basic research to educational application. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1997; 2: 119-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014317

Marschark M, Mayer TS. Mental representation and memory in deaf adults and children. In M. Marschark & M. D. Clark (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Deafness. Vol 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 1998; pp. 53-77.

Case RD, Kurland M, Goldberg J. Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. J Exp Child Psychol 1982; 33: 386-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6

Boutla M, Supalla T, Newport EL, Bavelier D. Short-term memory span: insights from sign language. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 997-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1298

Geraci C, Gozzi M, Papagno C, Cecchetto C. How grammar can cope with a limited short-term memory: Simultaneity and seriality in sign languages. Cognition 2008; 106: 780-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.014

Gozzi M, Geraci C, Cecchetto C, Perugini M, Papagno, C. Looking for an explanation for the low sign span. is order involved? J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2011; 16: 101-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq035

Krakow RA, Hanson VL. Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: Memory for signs, fingerspelling, and print. Mem Cognit 1985; 13: 265-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197689

Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Ingvar M. Neural correlates of working memory for sign language. Brain Res Cog Brain Res 2004; 20: 165-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.002

Capirci O, Cattani A, Rossini P, Volterra V. Teaching sign language to hearing children as a possible factor in cognitive enhancement. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1998; 3: 135-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014343

Wilson M, Bettger JG, Niculae I, Klima ES. Modality of language shapes working memory: Evidence from digit span and spatial span in ASL signers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1997; 2: 150-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014321

Turley-Ames KJ, Whitfield MM. Working memory training and task performance. J Mem Lang 2003; 49: 446-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00095-0

Bebko JM, Metcalfe-Haggert A. Deafness, language skills, and rehearsal: a model for the development of a memory strategy. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1997; 2: 131-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014319

MacSweeney M, Campbell R, Donlan C. Varieties of short-term memory coding in deaf teenagers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1996; 1: 249-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014300

MacNamara D, Scott JL. Working memory capacity and strategy use. Mem Cognit 2001; 29: 10-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195736

Nunes T, Evans D, Bell D, Campos T. Improving children’s working memory through guided rehearsal. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New York: April 2008.

Duncan J. Brain mechanisms of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 2006; 59: 2-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210500260674

Bourke PA, Duncan J, Nimmo-Smith I. A general factor involved in dual task performance decrement. Q J Exp Psychol 1996; 49A: 525-45.

Gregory S. Deaf children and their families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995.

Gregory S. Mathematics and deaf children. In S. Gregory, P. Knight, W. McCracken, S. Powers & L. Watson (Eds.), Issues in Deaf Education. London: David Fulton 1998; pp. 119-26.

Klingberg T. Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends Cogn Sci 2010; 14: 317-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002

Cowan N, Morey CC, AuBuchon AM, Zwilling CE, Gilchrist AL. Seven-year-olds allocate attention like adults unless working memory is overloaded. Dev Sci 2010; 13: 120-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00864.x

Mitchell T, Quittner A. Multimethod study of attention and behavior problems in hearing-impaired children. J Clin Child Psychol 1996; 25: 83-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2501_10

Quittner AL, Leibach P, Marciel K. The impact of cochlear implants on young deaf children: new methods to assess cognitive and behavioral development. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 547-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.5.547

Holmes J, Gathercole SE, Dunning DL. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Dev Sci 2009; 12: 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x

Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen P, et al. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD - A randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 2005; 44: 177-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010

Tamm L, Hughes C, Ames L, et al. Attention training for school-aged children with ADHD: results of an open trial. J Atten Disord 2010; 14: 86-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087054709347446

Thorell LB, Lindqvist S, Nutley SB, Bohlin G, Klingberg T. Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Dev Sci 2009; 12: 106-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x

Nunes T, Bryant P, Evans D, Bell D, Gardner S, Gardner A, Carraher JN. The contribution of logical reasoning to the learning of mathematics in primary school. Br J Dev Psychol 2007; 25: 147-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151006X153127

Blunch NJ. Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS. Los Angeles: Sage 2008.

Kloo D, Perner J. Training transfer between card sorting and false belief understanding: Helping children apply conflicting descriptions. Child Dev 2003; 74: 1823-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00640.x

Camos V, Lagner P, Barrouillet P. Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory. J Mem Lang 2009; 61: 457-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.002

Gathercole SE. Nonword repetition and word learning: the nature of the relationship. Appl Psycholinguistic 2006; 27: 513-43.

Cain K, Oakhill JV, Barnes MA, Bryant PE. Comprehension skill, inference making ability and their relation to knowledge. Mem Cognit 2001; 29: 850-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414

Gottardis L. Working memory and mathematical achievement in hearing impaired children. A secondary data analysis. University of Oxford, Oxford 2009.

Nunes T, Bryant P, Barros R, Sylva K. The relative importance of two different mathematical abilities to mathematical achievement. Br J Educ Psychol 2011; 82: 136-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02033.x

Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C. Is working memory training effective? a meta-analytic review. Dev Psychol 2013; 49: 270-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028228

Shallice T, Fletcher P, Frith CD, Grasby P, Frackowiak RSJ, Donlan RJ. Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature 1994; 368: 633-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/368633a0

Downloads

Published

2014-09-05

Issue

Section

Articles