Educational Assistants’ Use of ImPAACT for Increasing Message Selection and Turn-Taking with Children with Complex Communication Needs

Authors

  • Dana Pitman Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, PO Box 10076, USA
  • Monica L. Bellon-Harn Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, PO Box 10076, USA
  • Samantha Moody Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, PO Box 10076, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2016.04.02.1

Keywords:

Augmentative and alternative communication, educational assistant, multi-symbol messages.

Abstract

Context: Educational assistants (EAs) provide extensive and individualized support for many students who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in school systems. An important factor related to student’s success is EA training and skill development for effective communication with children who use AAC.

Case Report: This case series examined ImPAACT: Improving Partner Applications of Augmentative Communication Techniques with three EA and student dyads. The study investigated whether a comparable treatment effect as found in Binger et al. (2010) could be demonstrated. Three phases of intervention (i.e., baseline, instruction, and generalization) were investigated. All phases were completed in the public school setting in which the students were enrolled and the EAs were employed. EA’s correct application of instructional strategies, student’s multi-symbol selections, and student’s turns were calculated. Type and form of student’s turn were calculated as well.

Conclusions: All EAs increased correct application of strategies and all students increased use of multi-symbol selections and overall number of turns taken. Students’ type of turn (i.e., response, comment, initiation) and form of turn (i.e., vocalization, gesture, symbol selection) increased and diversified. Variable rates of behavior were noted across EAs and students. Potential explanations for these findings are discussed.

References

Soto G, Muller E, Hunt P, Goetz L. Professional Skills for Serving Students Who Use AAC in General Education Classrooms A Team Perspective. Lang, Speech, Hear Serv Sch 2001; 32(1): 51-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/005)

Kent-Walsh J, & Light J. General education teachers' experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Aug & Alt Comm 2003; 19(2): 104-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0743461031000112043

Kent-Walsh J, Murza KA, Malani MD, Binger C. Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Aug & Alt Comm 2015; 31(4): 271-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153

Rosa-Lugo LI, Kent-Walsh J. Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Comm Dis Quar 2008; 30(1): 49-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525740108320353

Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Ewing C, Taylor S. Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. Am Jour of Sp-Lang Path 2010; 19(2): 108-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015)

Douglas SN. Teaching paraeducators to support the communication of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: A literature review. Cur Iss in Educ 2012; 15(1).

Bingham MA, Spooner F, Browder D. Training paraeducators to promote the use of augmentative and alternative communication by students with significant disabilities Educ Train Dev Dis 2007; 339-52.

Hill DA, Flores MM, Kearley RF. Maximizing ESY Services: Teaching Pre-Service Teachers to Assess Communication Skills and Implement Picture Exchange With Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Disabilities. Teach Educ Spec Educ: Jour Teach Educ Div Coun Excep Child 2014; 37(3): 241-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888406414527117

Sennott SC, Light JC, McNaughton D. AAC Modeling Intervention Research Review. Res Prac Per Severe Dis 2016; 41(2): 101-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1540796916638822

Douglas SN, Light JC, McNaughton DB. Teaching paraeducators to support the communication of young children with complex communication needs. Top Ear Child Spe Ed 2013; 33(2): 91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271121412467074

Kent-Walsh J, Mcnaughton D. Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Aug & Alt Comm 2005; 21(3): 195-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434610400006646

Kent-Walsh J, Binger C, Hasham Z. Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Am Jour of Sp-Lang Path 2010; 19(2): 97-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0014)

Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Berens J, Del Campo S, Rivera D. Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Aug & Alt Com 2008; 24(4): 323-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434610802130978

Bedrosian J. Efficacy research issues in AAC: Interactive storybook reading. Aug & Alt Comm 1999; 15(1): 45-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434619912331278565

Byiers BJ, Reichle J, Symons FJ. Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. Am Jour of Sp-Lang Path 2012; 21(4): 397-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036)

Bridwell N. Clifford the Big Red Dog. Cartwheel Books, 2010.

Thorpe K. Dora’s Chilly Day. Simon & Schuster, 2005.

McDonald ET, Schultz AR. Communication boards for cerebral-palsied children. Jour Spe Hear Dis 1973; 38(1): 73-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshd.3801.73

Drager KD, Light JC, Speltz JC, Fallon KA, Jeffries LZ. The performance of typically developing 2 1/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Jour Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46(2): 298-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/024)

Binger C, Light J. The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Aug & Alt Comm 2007; 23(1): 30-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434610600807470

Bellon-Harn ML, Harn WE. Scaffolding Strategies During Repeated Storybook Reading An Extension Using a Voice Output Communication Aid. Foc Aut Other Dev Dis 2008; 23(2): 112-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088357608316606

Binger C, Maguire-Marshall M, Kent-Walsh J. Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Jour Speech Lang Hear Res 2011; 54(1): 160-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0163)

Schlosser RW, Wendt O. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. Am Jour of Sp-Lang Path 2008; 17(3): 212-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021)

Romski M & Sevcik R. Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Brookes, 1996.

Stephenson J. Book reading as an intervention context for children beginning to use graphic symbols for communication. Jour Dev Phys Dis 2010; 22(3): 257-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10882-009-9164-6

Schlosser R. Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Aug & Alt Comm 1999; 15(4): 234-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434619912331278775

Downloads

Published

2016-08-06

Issue

Section

Articles