Rogerian Style of Interpersonal Communication: Why is it not so Simple?

Authors

  • Ewa Banaszak Institute of Sociology, University of Wrocław, ul. Koszarowa 3, 51-149 Wrocław, Poland
  • Robert Florkowski University School of Physical Education, ul. Królowej Jadwigi 27/39, 61-871 Poznań, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2014.02.01.5

Keywords:

 transparency, empathy, unconditional positive regard, active listening, burnout, personality disorder.

Abstract

Carl Ransom Rogers was the only psychologist nominated for the Noble Prize. His whole professional life focused on major questions, such as, how to facilitate the process of interpersonal communication? What are the most important prerequisites of effective, aiming at mutual understanding, communication? Why people are so often unable to accurately communicate, even though they do not suffer from any form of speech and language pathology? According to Rogers, the crucial components of effective human to human contact are surprisingly simple in theory. Equally unexpected is that they are very difficult to implement into daily practice. Rogers’s main concepts can be signaled by simple terms: non-directive approach, active person centered listening, transparency, congruency, unconditional positive regard, empathy and suspension of judgment. In the first part of our article, we review the Rogerian major frame of thinking and we add some comments on it. In the second section of our paper, we indicate selected obstacles disrupting practical use of his style of communication e.g. work overload and burnout, or disturbances caused by personality disorders.

References

Fourie RJ. Qualitative study of the therapeutic relationship in speech and language therapy: perspectives of adults with acquired communication and swallowing disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009; 44: 979-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13682820802535285

Masson J. Against Therapy. London: Harper Collins Publisher 1993.

The King’s Speech, directed by Tom Hooper, screenplay by David Saidler 2010.

Rogers CR. Stevens B. Person to person: The problem of being human. London: A Condor Book. Souvenir Press (Educational & Academic) Ltd. 1994.

Travaline JM, Ruchinskas R, D’Alonzo GE. Patient-Physician Communication: Why and How, Jaoa clinical practice. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/87869619/Patient-Physician-Communication-Why-and-How-CLINICAL-PRACTICE (accessed March 05, 2014)

[Psychological reactance theory. http://www.psych-it.com.au/Psychlopedia/article.asp?id=65 (accessed December 28, 2013).

Davis MH. Empathy. A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press 1996.

Leary M. Self – presentation. Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press 1996.

Milgram S. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper Perennial 1974.

Ley P. Psychological studies of doctor – patient communication. In: Rachman S. (Ed.). Contributions to medical psychology. Vol. 1. Frankfurt: Pergamon Press 1980.

Fengler J. Pomaganie męczy: wypalenie w pracy zawodowej (Helfen macht müde). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne 2001.

Nowosielska K. Przemęczeni lekarze operują pacjentów. http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/kraj/rzeczpospolita-przemeczeni-lekarze-operuja-pacjentow/25r4l (accessed December 17, 2013).

Morreale SP, Spitzberg BH, Barge JK. Komunikacja między ludźmi. Motywacja, wiedza i umiejętności (Human communication). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN 2007.

Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ. Synopsis of Psychiatry. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1988.

Lowen A. Narcissism. Denial of the true self. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers 1985.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-05

Issue

Section

Articles