Spoken Language and Literacy Skills in French-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

Authors

  • Marie Thérèse Le Normand INSERM & Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, (EA 4057), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 71 avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne-Billancourt, France and Audiophonologie & Neuropsychologie, Hôpital Robert Debré, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75945 Paris Cedex 19, France
  • Marie Simon Centre de Recherche Cognition et Neurosciences & Université libre de Bruxelles, CP 191, 50, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, B-1050 Belgique
  • Jacqueline Leybaert Centre de Recherche Cognition et Neurosciences & Université libre de Bruxelles, CP 191, 50, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, B-1050 Belgique

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2014.02.01.4

Keywords:

MLU, language, literacy, longitudinal follow-up, predictive factors.

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of whether Mean Length of Utterance (MLU), an index of early productive grammar, predicts long-term outcomes of spoken language and literacy skills in French-speaking children with cochlear implants, and how this influence differs according to individual and environmental factors. Twenty-five school-aged children (12 boys and 13 girls), implanted between the ages of 25 and 78 months, were first followed at 3 and 5 years for MLU and then at 8 years after implantation for receptive language, reading and spelling. Univariate analyses of variance indicated that environmental factors (communication mode and SES) were significantly associated to receptive language and to a certain extent to literacy skills. Multivariate and regression analyses revealed that gender and MLU interacted with receptive language and literacy skills at 8 years after implantation. Such findings suggest that MLU at 3 years after implantation is a good predictor of receptive language and literacy skills 5 years later.

References

Geers AE. Predictors of reading skill development in children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2003; 24(Suppl): 59S-68. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000051690.43989.5D

Spencer LJ, Oleson JJ. Early listening and speaking skills predict later reading proficiency in pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2008; 29: 270-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000305158.84403.f7

Spencer LJ, Barker BA, Tomblin JB. Exploring the language and literacy outcomes of pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 236-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000069231.72244.94

Marschark M, Rhoten C, Fabich M. Effects of cochlear implants on children’s reading and academic achievement. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2007; 12: 269-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm013

Brown R. A first language: the early stage. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1973.

Klee T, Fitzgerald MD. The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes. J Child Lang 1985; 12: 251-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900006437

Scarborough HS, Rescorla L, Tager-Flusberg H, Fowler AE, Sudhalter V. The relation of utterance length to grammatical complexity in normal and language-disordered groups. Appl Psycholinguist 2008; 12: 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S014271640000936X

Ouellet C, Le Normand MT, Cohen H. Language evolution in children with cochlear implants. Brain Cogn 2001; 46: 231-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(01)80073-7

Le Normand M-T, Ouellet C, Cohen H. Productivity of lexical categories in French-speaking children with cochlear implants. Brain Cogn 2003; 53: 257-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00122-2

Moreno-Torres I, Torres S. From 1-word to 2-words with cochlear implant and cued speech: A case study. Clin Linguist Phon 2008; 22: 491-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699200801899145

Szagun G. Learning by ear: on the acquisition of case and gender marking by German-speaking children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants. J Child Lang 2004; 31: 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005889

Nicholas JG, Geers AE. Will they catch up? the role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50: 1048-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/073)

Ertmer DJ, Inniger KJ. Characteristics of the transition to spoken words in two young cochlear implant recipients. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52: 1579-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/06-0145)

Hammes DM, Novak MA, Rotz LA, Willis M, Edmondson DM, Thomas JF. Early identification and cochlear implantation: critical factors for spoken language development. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 74-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/ 12018355

Svirsky MA, Stallings LM, Lento CL, Ying E, Leonard LB. Grammatical morphologic development in pediatric cochlear implant users may be affected by the perceptual prominence of the relevant markers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 109-12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 12018335

Baldassari CM, Schmidt C, Schubert CM, Srinivasan P, Dodson KM, Sismanis A. Receptive language outcomes in children after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140: 114-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.09.008

Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Kirk KI, Henning SC, Gao S, Qi R. Using early language outcomes to predict later language ability in children with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2008; 13: 370-8. 370-378. doi:10.1159/000148200

Coerts J, Mills A. Spontaneous language development of young deaf children with a cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 385-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/7668716

Hasenstab MS, Tobey EA. Language development in children receiving nucleus multichannel cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1991; 12(Suppl): 55S-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199108001-00008

Spencer LJ, Tye-Murray N, Tomblin JB. The production of English inflectional morphology, speech production and listening performance in children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 310-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199808000-00006

Schopmeyer B, Mellon N, Dobaj H, Grant G, Niparko JK. Use of Fast For Word to enhance language development in children with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185: 95-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 11141025

Nott P, Cowan R, Brown PM, Wigglesworth G. Early language development in Children with Profound Hearing Loss Fitted with a Device at a young age: Part I— the time period taken to acquire first words and first word combinations. Ear Hear 2009; 30: 526-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a9ea14

Baumgartner WD, Pok SM, Egelierler B, Franz P, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi J. The role of age in pediatric cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 62: 223-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00621-8

Robinson K. Implications of developmental plasticity for the language acquisition of deaf children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 46: 71-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(98)00125-6

Locke JL. A theory of neurolinguistic development. Brain Lang 1997; 58: 265-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1791

Cillessen AHN, Bellmore AD Social skills and interpersonal perception in early and middle childhood in Smith PK, Hart CH (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development. Oxford, UK: BlackwellPublishing Ltd; 2004 p. 355‑74. doi.wiley.com/10.1111/b.9780631217534.2004. 00024.x

Putallaz M, Wasserman A. Children’s naturalistic entry behavior and sociometric status: A developmental perspective. Dev Psychol 1989; 25: 297-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.2.297

Zarbatany L, Van Brunschot M, Meadows K, Pepper S. Effects of friendship and gender on peer group entry. Child Dev 1996; 67: 2287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131623

Geers A, Brenner C. Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age. Ear Hear 2003; 24(Suppl): 2S-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000051685.19171.BD

Leybaert J. Phonology acquired through the eyes and spelling in deaf children. J Exp Child Psychol 2000; 75: 291-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2539

Mercier, M. Frog where are you, New York, Dial Books, 1969.

Rondal, JA. Bachelet, JF. Pérée F. Analyse du langage et des interactions verbales adulte-enfant. Bulletin d’Audiophonologie 1985; 5: 507-35.

MacWhinney B. The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk, Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.

Le Normand MT, Moreno-Torres I, Parisse C, Dellatolas G. How do children acquire early grammar and build multiword utterances? a Corpus study of French children aged 2 to 4. Child Dev 2013; 84: 647‑61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01873.x

Le Normand MT, Parisse C, Cohen H. Lexical diversity and productivity in French preschoolers: developmental, gender and sociocultural factors. Clin Linguist Phon 2008; 22: 47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699200701669945

Dunn LTW. Dunn CDL. Echelle de Vocabulaire en Images (EVIP): French Adaptation of Peabody Picture Vocabulary test-revised. Toronto: Psyscan. 1997.

Bishop DVM. The test for Reception Grammar. London: Psychological Corporation; 1983.

Lecoq P. L'ECOSSE, une Epreuve de Compréhension Syntaxico-Sémantique, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. 1996.

Mousty P, Leybaert J. Evaluation des habiletés de lecture et d'orthographe au moyen de la BELEC: données longitudinales auprès d'enfants francophones testés en 2ème et 4ème année. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée 1999; 4: 325-42.

Jaffré JF, Fayol M. Orthography and literacy in French. In: RM Joshi & PG. Aaron (eds) Handbook of orthography and literacy 2006; pp. 81-104.

Veronis J. From sound to spelling in French. Simulation on a computer. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition 1988; 8: 315-34.

Seymour PHK, Aro M, Erskine JM, et al. Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. Br J Psychol 2003; 94(Pt 2): 143-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859

Bauer DJ, Goldfield BA, Reznick JS. Alternative approaches to analyzing individual differences in the rate of early vocabulary development. Appl Psycholinguist 2002; 23: 313-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402003016

Morisset CE, Barnard KE, Booth CL. Toddlers’ language development: sex differences with in social risk. Dev Psychol 1995; 31: 851-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.851

Dionne G, Dale PS, Boivin M, Plomin R. Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development. Child Dev 2003; 74: 394-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402005

Geers AE, Strube MJ, Tobey EA, Pisoni DB, Moog JS. Epilogue: factors contributing to long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood. Ear Hear 2011; 32: 84S‑92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ffd5b5

Stern RE, Yueh B, Lewis C, Norton S, Sie KCY. Recent epidemiology of pediatric cochlear implantation in the United States: disparity among children of different ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 125‑31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000150698.61624.3c

Downloads

Published

2014-04-05

Issue

Section

Articles