Speech Preparation and Articulation Time in Bilinguals and Men
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2013.01.01.5Keywords:
Articulation preparation time, word articulation duration, bilingualism, sex differences.Abstract
The current study investigated the relationship between word utterance preparation time and word articulation duration in young adults. In a stratified sample, 40 monolinguals’ (20 males and 20 females) and 40 bilinguals’ (20 males and 20 females) word pronunciation of English words vs. derived, scrambled non-words as well as the hesitation before speaking were measured in milliseconds. Positive effects of bilingualism were found as these speakers showed significantly faster articulation of new non-words than their monolingual counterparts. Sex differences showed that independently of the number of languages men were able to speak, they needed more speech preparation time than women, but no difference in the duration of their word articulation time was observed. Preparation and articulation were correlated in monolingual speakers, but not in bilingual speakers. This suggests that the phonological loop was circumvented in bilingual speakers. We presume that bilinguals map multi-lingual phonology and were thus not saving time during preparation for articulation, but they appeared to have benefited from knowing multiple fine motor mouth movements of various languages during articulation itself. Future research may benefit from controlling the psychological factor of confidence when preparing to speak.
References
Levelt WJM. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation: MIT Press 1993.
Schirmer A, Kotz SA, Friederici AD. Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cogn Brain Res 2002; 14: 228-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00108-8
Schirmer A, Kotz SA, Friederici AD. On the role of attention for the processing of emotions in speech: Sex differences revisited. Cogn Brain Res 2005; 24: 442-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.022
Nicholson KG, Kimura D. Sex differences for speech and manual skills. Percept Mot Skills 1996; 82: 3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.82.1.3
Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Green DW, Gollan TH. Bilingual minds. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2009; 10: 89-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387084
Levelt WJ, Roelofs A, Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci 1999; 22: 1-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
Costa A, Caramazza A. The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. J Mem Lang 2002; 46: 178-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2804
Schriefers H. Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. Eur J Cogn Psychol 1999; 11: 17-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713752301
Goldman-Eisler F. Speech production and the predictability of words in context. Q J Exp Psychol A 1958; 10: 96-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470215808416261
Hieke AE, Kowal S, O'Connell DC. The trouble with Articulatory pauses. Lang Speech 1983; 26: 203-14.
Kimura D. Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1999.
Halpern DF. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 2000.
Engel de Abreu PMJ, Cruz-Santos A, Tourinho CJ, Martin R, Bialystok E. Bilingualism enriches the poor: Enhanced cognitive control in low-income minority children. Psychol Sci 2012; 23: 1364-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443836
Bialystok E. Reshaping the mind: the benefits of bilingualism. Can J Exp Psychol 2011; 65: 229-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025406
Bialystok E. Bilingualism in development. Language, literacy and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
Francis WS. Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: semantic representation. Psychol Bull 1999; 125: 193-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.193
Hambly H, Wren Y, McLeod S, Roulstone S. The influence of bilingualism on speech production: a systematic review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2013; 48: 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00178.x
Romaine S. Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell 1995.
Grosjean F. Another view of bilingualism. In: Harris R, editor. Cognitive processing in bilinguals. New York, NY: Elsevier 1992; pp. 51-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61487-9
Leech G, Rayson P, Wilson A. Word frequencies in written and spoken English based on the British National Corpus. Harlow: Longman 2001.
Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4: 417-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
Baddeley A, Thomson N, Buchanan M. Word length and the structure of short-term memory. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 1975; 14: 575-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4
Baddeley A, Gathercole S, Papagno C. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychol Rev 1998; 105: 158-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158
Papagno C, Valentine T, Baddeley A. Phonological short term memory and foreign vocabulary learning. J Mem Lang 1991; 30: 331-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90040-Q
Grosjean F, Miller LJ. Going in and out of languages: An example of bilingual flexibility. Psychol Sci 1994; 5: 201-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00501.x
Hirata Y, Kelly SD. Effects of lips and hands on auditory learning of second-language speech sounds. J Speech Lang Hearing Res 2010; 53: 298-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0243)