fNIR Study of Cognitive Decline and Reading in Parkinson’s Disease: Preliminary Data

Authors

  • In-Sop Kim School of Allied Health and Communicative Disorders, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2016.04.01.2

Keywords:

fNIR, Parkinson’s disease, cerebral hemoglobin concentration changes, cognitive deficits, reading, hemisphere differences, brain activation.

Abstract

As yet, there has been little research applying functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIR) neuroimaging studies to aspects of brain activation such as cognitive decline or working memory deficits with reading difficulties in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The purpose of this study is to investigate cerebral hemoglobin concentration changes related to reading and cognitive load tasks in an individual with PD. An individual with PD and a healthy normal person of the same age with no history of neurogenic disorders participated in this study. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIR) measurements were recorded while the participants carried out a reading task (grandfather passage) and four cognitive load tasks. The fNIR results for the reading task revealed significant differences in the changes in the oxygen concentration levels experienced by the two participants and this was also manifested in both the left and right hemispheres. There were also significant differences between the two participants across all of the cognitive tasks. Unlike the non-PD participant, the PD participant did not exhibit any significant differences among the four cognitive tasks and no significant oxygenation change between the left and right hemispheres when performing cognitive tasks 1 and 4 was observed. These results suggest that PD patients either lack sufficient brain activation to complete linguistic or cognitive tasks or are unable to use oxygenation effectively in a specific brain area when seeking to accomplish these types of tasks.

References

Anderson J, Hughes J, Rothi L, Crucian G, Heilman K. Developmental stuttering and Parkinson’s disease: the effects of levodopa treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66: 776-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.66.6.776

Kent RD. Research on speech motor control and its disorders: a review and prospective. J Commun Disord 2000; 33: 391-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00023-X

Kudlicka A, ClareL, Hindle JV. Executive functions in Parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord 2011; 26(13): 2305-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.23868

Baddeley AD. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2003; 4(10): 829-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201

Owen AM. The functional organization of working memory processes within human lateral frontal cortex: the contribution of functional neuroimaging. Eur J Neurosci 1997; 9(7): 1329-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01487.x

Baddeley AD, Gathercole SE, Papagno C. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychol Rev 1998; 105: 158-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158

Daneman M, Carpenter PA.Individual differences in working memory and Reading. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 1980; 19: 450-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6

Stuss DT, Knight RT. Principles of frontal lobe function, Oxford University Press, New York 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.001.0001

Cohen-Mimran R, Sapir S. Deficits in working memory in young adults with reading disabilities. J Commun Disord 2007; 40: 168-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.06.006

Angwin AJ, Chenery HJ, Copland DA, Murdoch BE, Silburn PA. Summation of semantic priming and complex sentence comprehension in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005; 25(1): 78-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.008

Grossman M, Cooke A, De vita CJ, et al. Grammatical and resource components of sentence processing inParkinson’s disease: An fMRI study. Neurology 2003; 60(5): 775-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000044398.73241.13

Lewis FM, LaPointe LL, Murdoch BE, Chenery HJ. Language impairment in Parkinson's disease. Aphasiology 1998; 12(3): 193-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249446

Murray LL. Language and Parkinson’s disease. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2008; 28: 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508080100

Péran P, Cardebat D, Cherubini A, et al. Object naming and action-verb generation in Parkinson's disease: A fMRI study. Cortex 2009; 45(8): 960-971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.019

Holtzer R, Mhoney JR, Izzetoglu M, Izzetoglu K, Onaral B, Verghese J. fNIRS studyof walking and walking while talking in young and old individuals. Journal of Gerontology: Med Sci 2011; 66A(8): 879-887.

Merzagora AC, Schultheis MT, Onaral B, Izzetoglu M. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based assessment of attention impairments after traumatic brain injury. J Innov Opt Health Sci 2011; 4(3): 251-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793545811001551

Irani F, Platek SM, Bunce S, Ruocco, AC, Chute D. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): An emerging neuroimaging technology with important applications for the study of brain disorders. Clin Neuropsychol 2007; 21: 9-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854040600910018

Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT): Examiner’s Manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 2001.

Conners CK, MHS Staff. Conner’s continuous performance test II (CPT II V. 5). North Tonawanda, NY: MultiHealth Systems 2000.

Ayaz H, Izzetoglu M. Shewokis PA, Onaral B. Sliding-window motion artifact rejection for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Conference Proceedings IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society 2010; 6567-6570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2010.5627113

Horovitz SG, Gore JC. Simultaneous event-related potential and near-infrared spectroscopic studies of semantic processing. Hum Brain Mapp 2004; 22(2): 110-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20018

Liu KR, Borrett DS, Cheng A, Gasparro D, Kwan HC. Near-infrared spectroscopy study of language activated hyper-and hypo-oxygenation in human prefrontal cortex. Int J Neurosci 2008; 118: 657-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207450701242792

Sakatani K, Lichty W, Xie Y, Li S, Zuo H. Effects of aging on language-activated cerebral blood oxygenation changes of the left prefrontal cortex: near infrared spectroscopy study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1999; 8(6): 398-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1052-3057(99)80047-0

Buckner RL, Corbetta M, Schatz J, Raichle ME. Preserved speech abilities and compensation following prefrontal damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 1249-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.3.1249

Ohyama M, Senda M, Kitamura S, Ishii K, Mishina M, Terashi A. Role of the nondominant hemisphere and undamaged area during word repetition in poststroke aphasics: A PET activation study. Stroke 1996; 27: 897-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.27.5.897

Kaneko H, Yoshikawa T, Nomura K, Ito H, Yamauchi H, Ogura M, Honjo S. Hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal cortex during digit span task: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuropsychobiology 2011; 63(2): 59-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000323446

Kuruvilla MS, Green JR, Ayaz H, Murman DL. Neural correlates of cognitive decline in ALS: An fNIRS study of the prefrontal cortex. Cogn Neurosci 2013; 4: 115-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.797889

Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Junque C, Marti MJ, Tolosa D. Brain structural MRI correlates ofcognitive dysfunctions in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 2011; 310: 70-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.07.054

Goldberg TE, Berman KF, Fleming K, Ostrem J, Van Horn JD, Esposito G, Weinberger DR. Uncoupling cognitive workload and prefrontal cortical physiology: A PET rCBF study. Neuroimage 1998; 7: 296-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0338

Downloads

Published

2016-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles