Speech Motor Control in Children with Downs Syndrome: Evidences from Formant Centralization Ratio

Authors

  • Radish Kumar Balasubramanium Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College (Manipal University), Mangalore, India
  • Vibha Kanagokar Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College (Manipal University), Mangalore, India
  • N.M. Sreya Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College (Manipal University), Mangalore, India
  • Jayashree S. Bhat Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College (Manipal University), Mangalore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2015.03.01.4

Keywords:

 Formant centralization ratio, Speech motor control, Downs syndrome, Vowel centralization.

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have highlighted the sensitivity of Formant centralization ratio (FCR) in the identification of vowel centralization. Since children with Downs Syndrome (DS) are found to exhibit imprecise articulation, the present study aimed at evaluating whether children with DS exhibit vowel centralization using FCR.

Method: The study included 30 children with Downs syndrome and 30 healthy age and gender matched controls in the age range of 6-8 years. Materials consisted of 9 words with three vowels (/i/, /u/, and /a/) in the initial, medial, and the final word positions respectively. First and second formant frequency values were extracted using PRAAT software. The vowel-formant data (e.g., frequency of F1, F2 etc.) were separately averaged for each child and then the FCR was constructed from these averages using the formula (F2u+F2a+F1i+F1u) / (F2i+F1a). Independent t-test was employed to find out the significance of difference between the means of the two groups.

Results: The results of Independent t-test revealed significant difference between the mean FCR of both the groups at
t= 8.535, p < 0.00 indicating higher FCR values in children with Downs syndrome in comparison to typically developing peers.

Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated that FCR obtained from both the groups vary significantly, thereby indicating that the vowel production in children with Downs syndrome may be subjected to vowel centralization. The present findings suggest the potential abilities of FCR metric in identifying vowel errors without characterizing the nature of vowel abnormalities and hence this metric should be used in the clinical population with caution.

References

Moura C, Cunha L, Vilarinho H, et al. Voice parameters in children with Down syndrome. J Voice 2008; 22: 34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.08.011

Pentz AL. Formant amplitude of children with Down's syndrome. Am J Ment Defic 1987; 92: 230-3.

Swift E, Rosin M. Remediation sequence to improve speech intelligibility for students with Down syndrome. Lang, Speech Hear Ser Sch 1990; 21: 140-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2103.140

Kumin L. Intelligibility of speech in children with Down syndrome in natural settings: parent’s perspective. Percept Mot Skills 1994; 78: 307-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.1.307

Kumin L. Speech intelligibility and childhood verbal apraxia in children with Down syndrome. Down Syndr Res Pract 2006; 10: 10-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3104/reports.301

Kumin L. Maximizing speech and language in children and adolescents withDown syndrome. In: Cohen W, Nadel L, Madnick M, Editors. Down syndrome: Visions for the 21st century. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002a.

Kumin L. Why can’t you understand what I am saying: speech intelligibility in daily life. Disability Solutions 2002b; 5: 1-15.

Heselwood B, Bray M, Crookston I. Juncture, rhythm, and planning in the speech of adults with Down’s syndrome. Clin Linguist Phon 1995; 9: 121-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699209508985328

Chapman R, Sueng H, Schwartz A, Kay-Raining Bird, A. Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome: II production deficits. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 861-873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4104.861

Miller J, Leddy, M. Down syndrome: the impact of speech production on language development. In: Paul R, Editor. Communication and language intervention series: Vol. 8. Exploring the speech-language connection. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 1998.

Rosin M, Swift E. Communication intervention: improving the speech intelligibility of children with Down syndrome. In: Miller J, Leddy M, Leavitt L, Editors. Improving the communication of people with Down syndrome (pp. 133-160). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co: 1999.

Chapman R, Hesketh L. Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2000: 6: 84-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:2<84::AID-MRDD2>3.0.CO;2-P

Stoel-Gammon C. Down syndrome phonology: developmental patterns and intervention strategies. Down Syndr Res Pract 2001; 7: 93-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3104/reviews.118

Van Borsel J. Articulation in Down’s syndrome adolescents and adults. Eur J Disord Commun 1996: 31: 415-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13682829609031330

Bunton K, Leddy M, Miller J. Phonetic intelligibility testing in adults with Down Syndrome. Down Syndr Res Pract 2009: 12: 144-54.

Turner G, Tjaden K, Weismer G. The influence of speaking rate on vowel space and intelligibility for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 1001-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3805.1001

Weismer G, Laures J, Jeng J-Y, Kent R, Kent J. Effect of speaking rate manipulations on acoustic and perceptual aspects of the dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Folia Phoniat logop 2000; 52: 201-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000021536

Moran M. Identification of Down’s syndrome adults from prolonged vowel samples. J Commun Disord 1986; 19: 387-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(86)90028-6

Bunton K, Leddy M. An evaluation of articulatory working space area in vowel production of adults with Downs syndrome. Clin Linguist Phon 2011; 25: 321-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2010.535647

Sapir S, et al. Formant centralization ratio (FCR) as a sensitive metric of vowel undershoot: Comparison with vowel space area (VSA) in impaired versus healthy speakers. PLM2008 Abstract 2008; Retrieved from http: //ifa.amu.edu.pl/plm/.

Hillenbrand J, Getty L, Clark M, Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3099-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.411872

Sapir S, Ramig LO, Spielman JL, Fox C. Formant Centralization Ratio (FCR): A proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech. J speech lang hear res 2010; 53: 114-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0184)

Lakkana S, Venkatesh K, Bhat JS. Assessment of language development 2007. Mangalore: Codeword Publishers.

Rosin M, Swift E, Bless D, Vetter D. Communication profiles of adolescents with Down syndrome. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders 1998; 12: 49-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152574018801200105

Redman R, Shapiro B, Gorlin R. Measurement of normal and reportedly malformed palatal vaults: III. Down’s syndrome (trisomy 21, Mongolism). J Pediatr 1965; 67: 162-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(65)80238-4

Ardran G, Harker P, Kemp F. Tongue size in Down syndrome. J Ment Defic Res 1972; 16: 160-6.

Borghi R. Consonant phoneme and distinctive feature error patterns in speech. In: Van Dyke D, Lang D, Heide F, van Duyne S, Soucek M, Editors. Clinical perspectives in the management of Down syndrome. New York: Springer; 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9644-4_12

Downloads

Published

2015-08-03

Issue

Section

Articles