Non-Native Raters and Native Speech: Other Perspective for the Research on Comprehensibility of Second Language Input
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2017.05.03Keywords:
Speech comprehensibility, nationality, grades, socioeconomic status, second language.Abstract
This study examines how specific variables such as age, first language, nationality, school grade and socioeconomic status (SES) affect the comprehensibility of second language (L2) speech in 92 second/non-native language learners. Comprehensibility refers to the degree of speech understanding. Fluency, rhythm, grammatical features and word stressing are concurrent factors for the listening comprehension (and the listener comprehensibility) mainly in L2 context. Research evidence focused the quality and differences of speech samples produced by the L2 learners and the comprehensibility rated by native speakers. In reverse scenario there is less evidence on the judgment of L2 learners for speech samples produced by native speakers. In this study we analysed if the comprehensibility ability of 92 young Portuguese L2 learners differ in the following conditions: age, nationality, home language, school grade, proficiency and socioeconomic status. Speech (one text) was recorded by a native speaker and was judged by L2 speakers using 1-5 Likert scale for comprehension difficulty. Main results showed that neither age nor home language had influence for comprehensibility, but socioeconomic, nationality and grades accounted for statistical differences between the groups tested. Also, data suggested that phonetic features are more likely important for the beginner in second language learning compared to the semantic features of speech that heavily depend on vocabulary domain.
References
Munro MJ, Derwing TM, Morton SL.The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in second language acquisition 2006; 28(1): 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049
Gynan SN. Comprehension, irritation, and error hierarchies. Hispania 1985; 68: 160-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/341633
Ensz KY. French attitudes toward typical speech errors of American speakers of French 1982; The Modern Language Journal, 66: 133-139.
White L. Against Comprehensible Input: the Input Hypothesis and the Development of Second-language Competence1. Applied linguistics 1987; 8(2): 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.95
Gass SM, Varonis EM. The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning 1984; 34: 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00996.x
Sadoski M, Goetz ET, Fritz JB. Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology 1993; 85(2): 291. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.291
Derwing T, Munro M. Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1997; 19: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010
Derwing TM, Munro MJ, Thomson RI. A longitudinal study of ESL learners' fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics 2008; 29(3): 359-380. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041
Kennedy S, Trofimovich P. Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review 2008; 64(3): 459-489. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459
Isaacs T, Trofimovich P. Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2012; 34(3): 475- 505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150
Major RC. Identifying a foreign accent in an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2007; 29(4): 539-556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070428
Calla MW. The Scalability of degrees of foreign accent (multidimensionality, inter-rater reliability, salience). 1986. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation.
Chen HC. Second language timing patterns and their effects on native listeners. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 2010; 36(2): 183-212.
Munro MJ, Derwing TM. Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign accented speech. Language and speech 1995; 38(3): 289- 306.
O'Brien MG. L2 Learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning 2014; 64(4): 715-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12082
Crowther D, Trofimovich P, Isaacs T, Saito K. Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal 2015; 99(1): 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185
Flege JE, Frieda EM, Nozawa T. Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics 1997; 25(2): 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0040
Spada N, Lightbown PM. Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acqui sition. The Modern Language Journal 1999; 83(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00002
Winke P, Gass S, Myford, C. Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing 2013; 30(2): 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456968
Ferragne E, Pellegrino F. A comparative account of the suprasegmental and rhythmic features of British English dialects. Modelisations pour l’Identification des Langues 2004.
Derwing TM, Rossiter MJ, Munro MJ. Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 2002; 23(4): 245- 259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630208666468
Stager CL., Werker JF. Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature 1997; 388(6640), 381-382. https://doi.org/10.1038/41102
Rubin J. A review of second language listening comprehension research. The modern language journal 1994; 78(2): 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x
Chaudron C. Comprehension, comprehensibility, and learning in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1985; 7(2): 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005386
Swain M, Lapkin S. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied linguistics 1995; 16(3): 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371
Ünal E., Papafragou A. Production-comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language 2016; 89: 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.001
Benedict H. Early lexical development: comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 1979; 6(02): 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002245
Werker JF, Byers-Heinlein K. Bilingualism in infancy: First steps in perception and comprehension. Trends in cognitive sciences 2008; 12(4): 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.008
Saito K., Webb S., Trofimovich P, Isaacs T. Lexical profiles of comprehensible second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2015; 1-25.
Saito Y., Saito K. Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research 2016; 1362168816643111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816643111
Carrier K. The social environment of second language listening: Does status play a role in comprehension). The Modern Language Journal 1999; 83(1): 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00006
Hoff E. Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology 2013; 49(1): 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027238
Walker D, Greenwood C, Hart B, Carta J. Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development 1994; 65(2): 606- 621. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131404
Bowey J. Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 1995; 87(3): 476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.476
