Psychological Work Environment and Professional Satisfaction Among Indian Audiologists

Authors

  • Vinaya Manchaiah Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas 77710, USA and The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, SE-58183, Linköping, Sweden and Audiology India, Mysore, India
  • Vijayalakshmi Easwar Audiology India, Mysore, India and The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
  • Sriram Boothalingam Audiology India, Mysore, India and Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA
  • Srikanth Chundu Audiology India, Mysore, India and Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
  • Rajalakshmi Krishna Audiology India, Mysore, India and All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, University of Mysore, Mysore-570001, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2311-1917.2015.03.01.3

Keywords:

 Audiologist, hearing healthcare, healthcare professional, occupational stress, organisational form, India.

Abstract

Objective: The study examined self-reported work environment and professional satisfaction among Indian audiologists.

Method: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted using the demand-control-support questionnaire (DCSQ), a short version of the effort-reward-imbalance (ERI) questionnaire and open-ended questions to explore professional issues. Seventy-one Indian audiologists participated in the survey.

Results: No association was found between demographic factors (i.e., gender, education, work type, and work settings) and the DCSQ and ERI sub-scales. Using the demand control model, 14% of audiologists reported working in a high-stress psychological work environment. Using the ERI ratio to estimate the imbalance between efforts and reward, it was observed that 72% of the participants experienced unfavourable working situations where the reward did not correspond to the effort made. Audiologists identified various professional issues including ‘lack of awareness of the profession among public’ and ‘unethical practice by other professionals and unqualified people is a concern’, and also made some suggestions on how to overcome them.

Conclusions: The results suggest that a high percentage of audiologists perceive to be practising in high effort-low reward working conditions in comparison with audiologists in other countries such as Sweden. Further work is required to understand, and possibly overcome various professional concerns raised by audiologists.

References

Manchaiah VKC, Sivaprasad MR, Chundu S, Dutt SN. Ear and Hearing Healthcare Services in India. ENT Audiol News 2010; 19(5): 93-5.

Manchaiah VKC, Sivaprasad MR, Chundu S. Audiology in India. Audiol Today 2009; 21(6): 38-44.

Easwar V, Boothalingam S, Chundu S, Manchaiah VKC, Ismail SM. Audiological practices in India: An internet based survey of audiologists. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 65(Suppl 3): 636-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-013-0674-2

Theorell T, Karasek RA. Current issues relating to psychological job strain and cardiovascular disease research. J Occup Health Psychol 1996; 1: 9-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.9

Saccone P, Steiger J. Audiologists’ professional satisfaction. Am J Audiol 2012; 21: 140-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0005)

Brännström KJ, Båsjo S, Larsson J, et al. Psychological work environment among Swedish audiologists. Int J Audiol 2013; 52(3): 151-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.743045

Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurs Educ Today 2004; 24: 105-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

Sanne B, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Moen BE, Tell GS. Testing the Job Demand-Control-Support model with anxiety and depression as outcomes: The Hordaland Health Study. Occupat Med 2005; 55: 463-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi071

De Jonge J, Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J. Job strain effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50(9): 1317-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00388-3

Van der Doef M, Maes S. The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 1999; 13(2): 87-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026783799296084

Foxall M, Zimmerman L, Standley R, Bene B. A comparison of frequency and sources of nursing job stress perceived by intensive care, hospice and medical-surgical nurses. J Adv Nurs 1990; 15: 577-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01857.x

Siegrist J. Effort-reward imbalance at work and health. Research in occupational stress and well-being 2002; 2: 261-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3555(02)02007-3

Antoniou ASG, Cooper CL, Eds. Research companion to organizational health psychology, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781845423308

Downloads

Published

2015-08-03

Issue

Section

Articles