Correlates of Resilience in Adolescents and Adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12970/2310-8231.2013.01.01.2Keywords:
Adults, affect, adolescents, emotional stress, happiness, psychological resilience.Abstract
We sought to examine several positive and negative correlates of resilience (i.e., affect, gratitude, perceived stress, subjective happiness, mastery, and emotional reactivity) in a community sample of adolescents and adults and to determine whether these correlates of resilience differed between the groups. Seventy-nine community residents of an Upper Midwest community (48 adolescents aged 12-18 years and 31 adults aged 34-84 years) completed 8 validated self-report questionnaires, totaling 96 items, over an 8-week period. Bivariate analyses showed several moderate to large associations of the variables with resilience and several appeared to show differences in the magnitude of the associations by age group. Hierarchical regression models examining all psychosocial predictors of resilience showed that only positive affect and negative affect predicted unique variance in resilience. In addition, evaluation of hierarchical models showed evidence of interaction between age and positive affect, gratitude, and subjective happiness in predicting resilience. Associations between gratitude, positive affect, and happiness with resilience were consistently stronger for adults as compared to adolescents. These data provide preliminary evidence on potential differences to consider regarding psychosocial correlates of resilience in adolescents and adults and have implications for intervention and resilience promotion.
References
Masten AS, Best KM, Garmezy N. Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of adolescents who overcome adversity. Dev Psychopathol 1990; 2(4): 425-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400005812
American_Psychological_Association. Stress in America: Our health at risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 2012.
Lutha SS, Cicchetti D. The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Dev Psychopathol 2000; 12(4): 857-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004156
Southwick SM, Vythilingam M, Charney DS. The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: Implications for prevention and treatment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005; 1: 255-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143948
Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003; 18(2): 76-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
Crawford JR, Henry JD. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2004; 43(3): 245-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0144665031752934
McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang JA. The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 82(1): 112-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112
Cohen S. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. The Social Psychology of Health. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; US 1988; pp. 31-67.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24(4): 385-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136404
Lyubomirsky S, Lepper HS. A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Indic Res 1999; 46(2): 137-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
Pearlin LI, Lieberman MA, Menaghan EG, Mullan JT. The stress process. J Health Soc Behav 1981; 22(4): 337-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136676
Nock MK, Wedig MM, Holmberg EB, Hooley JM. The Emotion Reactivity Scale: Development, evaluation, and relation to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. Behav Ther 2008; 39(2): 107-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.005
Cutuli JJ, Chaplin TM, Gillham JE, Reivich KJ, Seligman MEP. Preventing co-occurring depression symptoms in adolescents with conduct problems: The Penn Resiliency Program. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1094: 282-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1376.035
Howard S, Hughes BM. Benefit of social support for resilience-building is contingent on social context: Examining cardiovascular adaptation to recurrent stress in women. Anxiety Stress Coping 2011; 1-13.
Isaacowitz DM, Seligman MEP. Cognitive style predictors of affect change in older adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2002; 54(3): 233-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/J6E5-NP5K-2UC4-2F8B
Poortinga W. Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health Place 2012; 18(2): 286-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.017
Springgate BF, Wennerstrom A, Meyers D, Allen CE, 3rd, Vannoy SD, Bentham W, et al. Building community resilience through mental health infrastructure and training in post-Katrina New Orleans. Ethn Dis 2011; 21(3 Suppl 1): S1-20-9.
Schneider TR, Rench TA, Lyons JB, Riffle RR. The influence of neuroticism, extraversion and openness on stress responses. Stress Health 2011.
