Measuring the Veracity of Alcohol and Drug Users’ Self-Report of Sobriety

Authors

  • Todd D. Pizitz Vista, 410 S. Melrose Drive, #202, Vista, CA 92081, USA
  • Joseph M. McCullaugh Vista, 410 S. Melrose Drive, #202, Vista, CA 92081, USA
  • Phil Sprague Vista, 410 S. Melrose Drive, #202, Vista, CA 92081, USA
  • Austin Blue Vista, 410 S. Melrose Drive, #202, Vista, CA 92081, USA
  • James Vacaro Vista, 410 S. Melrose Drive, #202, Vista, CA 92081, USA
  • Don Mealing Vista, 410 S. Melrose Drive, #202, Vista, CA 92081, USA
  • Kathleen Fernandez Vista, 410 S. Melrose Drive, #202, Vista, CA 92081, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12970/2310-8231.2014.02.01.7

Keywords:

 Deception Detection, Psychophysiological Response, Drug and Alcohol Abusers, Veracity.

Abstract

Countless people are afflicted with alcohol and drug use disorders. Those involved in sobriety maintenance programs are often subjected to alcohol and drug urine tests to measure the veracity of their self-reported claims of sobriety. To assess deception among alcohol and drug users, the Veracity TouchScreener™, and an alcohol and drug urine drug test was administered to 80 participants. The TouchScreener™, which is an interactive touchscreen that measures Significant Psychophysiological Responses (SPR) to sets of questions revealed an estimated 92% accuracy at classifying alcohol and drug user’s self-report of sobriety. This study assists in adding to the burgeoning base of research indicating that psychophysiological measures are effective and show robust accuracy in assessing suspected deception in participant responses.

References

Bagby RM, Rogers R, Nicholson R, et al. Does clinical training facilitate feigning schizophrenia on the MMPI-2? Psychol Assess 1997; 9: 106-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.9.2.106

DePaulo BM, Pfeifer RL. On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. J Appl Soc Psychol 1986; 16: 249-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01138.x

Ekman P, O'Sullivan M. Who can catch a liar? Am Psychol 1991; 46: 913-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913

Gough HG. Some common misconceptions about neuroticism. J Consult Psychol 1954; 18: 287-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0062776

Kohnken GN. Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? Soc Behav 1987; 2: 1- 17.

Kraut RE, Poe DB. Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980; 39: 784-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.784

National Research Council. The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press 2003.

Starrels JL, Fox AD, Kunins HV, Cunningham CO. They don’t know what they know: Internal medicine residents’ knowledge and confidence in urine drug test interpretation for patients with chronic pain. J Gen Inter Med 2012; 27: 1521-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2165-7

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – text revision (DSM-IV-TR) – 4th ed. Washington, DC: Author 2000.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda.htm. (accessed on March 12, 2014).

Rogers R. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York, NY US: Guilford Press 2008.

Williams RJ, Nowatzki N. Validity of adolescent self-report of substance use. Subst Use Misuse 2005; 40: 299-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/JA-200049327

Winters KC, Stinchfield RD, Henly GA, Schwartz RH. Validity of adolescent self-report of alcohol and other drug abuse. Int J Addict 1991; 25: 1379-95.

Sprague P. Psychophysiological stress analysis research and validation studies. http://www.pvsa.net/main/page_ research.html. (accessed March 12, 2014).

United States v. Antelope, 395 F.3d 1128, 1133-39 (9th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Cope, 527 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir. 2008).

Downloads

Published

2014-04-05

Issue

Section

Articles